![]() ![]() The 'systems they sell' link points to systems they consider ideal for Photshop. In other relevant benchmarks (Single Core CPU) the PC seems to perform better, but I'm unsure of how this would translate to real-world Photoshop usage.".īy articles I linked to below all have extensive results specifically for Photoshop, but you can change the filters for other apps. Since Photoshop is a lightly threaded non hardware intensive program optimizations like this could have a large impact on real world performance.Īs I have mentioned earlier " The only benchmark I can find for Photoshop is PugetBench, but this seems to still have the Mac system running through Rosetta. Which makes me wonder where Photoshop stands. This would lead me to believe that the program he is using is more optimized for Apple silicon. ![]() The M2 Ultra is a faster cpu in a cpu based task, but its not 3x faster (atleast not on paper). In this video (at around the 6 minute mark) the Mac Studio M2 Ultra is able to stabilize a clip in less than 1/3 the time of a PC (7800X3D + 4090). I've seen videos in other programs where the Apple chips perform much better than one would assume based on specs alone. I think this difference may be much more significant with Apple processors. An i9 13900k is 11% faster than a Ryzen 9 7900x (in PugetBench) even though on paper they should be closer in terms of performance. Even between intel and amd cpus, intel seems to have a slight lead in terms of optimization with photoshop. The OS itself may not be as relevant for performance, but the associated hardware may be. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |